US Schools, Research Advocates Urge Withdrawal of Proposed Rule on Federal Grants

FILE PHOTO: A general view shows Georgetown University in Washington, U.S., October 18, 2024. REUTERS/Jose Luis Gonzalez/File Photo

By Kanishka Singh

WASHINGTON, July 13 (Reuters) – Top U.S. ⁠universities ⁠and research advocates urged President ⁠Donald Trump’s administration on Monday to withdraw a proposed rule ​on federal grants that critics say would politicize the process of distributing, administering and ‌terminating grants.

Read more New York Becomes the First State to Impose a Data Center Moratorium

Here are details:

• The ‌proposals would authorize agencies to unilaterally modify or terminate awards based on shifting ⁠policy priorities ⁠or national-interest determinations, while eliminating existing appeals processes, according to ​the American Hospital Association.

• The proposals were made in a May 29 notice of proposed rulemaking issued by the White House’s Office of Management and Budget that would revise the ​government’s guidance for federal financial assistance, commonly known as the “Uniform Guidance.”

• “Many of ⁠the proposed ⁠changes would weaken the ⁠merit-based, expert-driven ​system that has made U.S. research the global standard,” Johns Hopkins University Interim ​Provost Lainie Rutkow and ⁠its vice provost for research, Denis Wirtz, said in a letter to the White House.

• The proposals would “destabilize the nation’s innovation ecosystem,” they added.

• Georgetown University said it opposed the White House’s proposed changes to its expert peer review, research ⁠outcomes and restrictions on international collaboration and partnerships.

Read more L3Harris Gets $955 Million US Contract to Supply 18 Satellites for Golden Dome Missile Shield

• The American Association for Cancer ⁠Research said the proposals would “severely set back our nation’s medical science enterprise and delay the groundbreaking treatments pivotal to improving patient outcomes and saving lives.”

• The Trump administration says the revisions are aimed at improving transparency, accountability and oversight for federal grants.

• Trump has used the threat of federal funding suspensions against universities and research institutions over a range of issues.

• These include pro-Palestinian protests against U.S. ally Israel’s assault on ⁠Gaza, diversity initiatives, transgender policies and climate programs.

• The National Council of Nonprofits, the American Council on Education and dozens of education associations said the proposals would shift grant decisions from merit to politics by requiring ​political appointees to decide which grants get funding.

Read more US House Democratic Women’s Caucus Urges USDA to Reinstate Women Ousted From Soybean Board

(Reporting by Kanishka ​Singh in Washington; Editing by Jamie Freed)

Copyright 2026 Thomson Reuters.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *